- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:43:35 -0700
- To: Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
This completes tracking-ACTION-467. Since we obviously have different ideas of what tracking data means, I will list the 9 occurrences of the phrase "tracking data" below and explain what I think it is supposed to cover. [TPE] (within new "G" TSV) • the gateway MUST have a contract in place with each of the parties to whom it provides request data such that only the selected party is allowed to retain tracking data from a request with an expressed tracking preference of DNT:1; and, I intended this use to include all data covered by our definition of tracking: data regarding a particular user's activity across multiple distinct contexts and data derived from that activity outside the context in which the user activity occurred. I suggest we replace it with "... such that, for requests with an expressed tracking preference of DNT:1, only the selected party is allowed to retain data that might have the effect of tracking the user without consent." (within 6.4.3 Status Checks are not Tracked) An origin server MUST NOT retain tracking data regarding requests on the site-wide tracking status resource or within the tracking status resource space, regardless of the presence, absence, or value of a DNT header field, cookies, or any other information in the request. I intended this use to include any data that the user would consider as tracking them, which (because this is only a request on the status resource and not about normal user activity) is roughly equivalent to any data that has not been de-identified. I suggest we replace it with An origin server MUST NOT retain data regarding requests on the site-wide tracking status resource or within the tracking status resource space, regardless of the presence, absence, or value of a DNT header field, cookies, or any other information in the request, if such data would have the effect of tracking the user. [TCS] Within 2.9.1 De-identification Considerations: • technical safeguards that prohibit reidentification of deidentified data and/or merging of the original tracking data and deidentified data; I believe that use was supposed to include all data from the definition of tracking, though looking carefully it seems "merging of the original" is impossible given our definition of de-identified (keeping the original would imply that the data hadn't been de-identified); the second half of that sentence should be deleted. • business processes that specifically prohibit reidentification of deidentified data and/or merging of the original tracking data and deidentified data; ditto • business processes that prevent inadvertent release of either the original tracking data or deidentified data; ditto • administrative controls that limit access to both the original tracking data and deidentified data. ditto. All of these seem to be based on some other definition of de-identified. Ours doesn't allow the original tracking data to coexist. Within 3.3 Third Party Compliance: When a third party to a given user action receives a DNT:1 signal in a related network interaction: • that party MUST NOT collect, share, or use tracking data related to that interaction; • that party MUST NOT use data about network interactions with that user in a different context. This would only be sufficient if tracking data includes everything in our definition of tracking, since it would otherwise allow collection (but not use in this response) of segmentation data. I already suggested that the order be reversed so that the later MAYs (e.g., consent) are listed first and this follow with a prefix of "Otherwise, ...". Ignoring that for a second, I suggest that this be replaced by: When a third party to a given user action receives a DNT:1 signal in a related network interaction, the party MUST NOT • collect data from this network interaction that would cause data regarding this particular user's activity to have been collected across multiple distinct contexts; • retain, use, or share data derived from this network interaction outside the context in which this user activity occurred; nor, • use data about this particular user's past activity within different contexts to inform or construct a response to this network interaction. Within 3.3.1.3 No Personalization: A party that collects data for a permitted use MUST NOT use that data to alter a specific user's online experience based on tracking data, except as specifically permitted below. "based on tracking data" is redundant here and should be deleted. Within the example in 3.3.3 Qualifiers for Permitted Uses): A site that tracks user activity across several unrelated sites (through a tracking pixel or embedded script, for example) but collects and uses tracking data only as necessary for security and debugging purposes might create a tracking status resource with a tracking status value of T (to indicate tracking) and a qualifiers value of sd (to indicate the particular permitted uses). "tracking data" can be replaced with "data about that activity". Cheers, Roy T. Fielding <http://roy.gbiv.com/> Senior Principal Scientist, Adobe <http://www.adobe.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2015 19:43:57 UTC