- From: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 05:05:57 +0000
- To: Nick Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
- CC: Justin Brookman <justin@jbrookman.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Friday, July 24, 2015 3:40 PM, Nick Doty wrote: > I think the typical CR period is a couple of months at least; we'll need to gather > implementation experience and test results. Regarding CR exit criteria, we typically > look for multiple (at least two) interoperable implementations of each feature, which > is what I would propose to the Director. Many of the features (for example, fields > in the tracking status resource) are optional, so we're not expecting single > implementations that use every feature. Thank Nick. I'm aware of the general case. My question was about what specifically would be the CR criteria for this document. The working group needs to determine the consensus for the minimum CR period, especially considering at risk features, and the objective exit criteria, which should be included in the published document. When will the group be able to review your concrete proposal? Thanks, Adrian.
Received on Monday, 27 July 2015 05:06:44 UTC