Re: The de-identification call for objections

ah, got it

On Sep 12, 2014, at 9:33 , Justin Brookman <justin@cdt.org> wrote:

> Yes, I don't think this was supposed to be live yet; Nick was going to input a few edits (including this one) and then I was going to send to the group (with updated dates as well).
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: "David (Standards) Singer"
> Date:09/12/2014 11:37 AM (GMT-05:00)
> To: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)"
> Subject: The de-identification call for objections
> 
> I suspect it is an artifact of the web voting form, but I note that in option A the text after the definition was intended to be in a suitably-placed separate section and labeled as informative; these points do not show in the form.  Will this confuse anyone?
> 
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
> 
> 

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Friday, 12 September 2014 16:35:12 UTC