- From: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:39:34 +0000
- To: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
We should agree to disagree then as the same statement could be added to every single provision of the document. Wasteful... - Shane -----Original Message----- From: Walter van Holst [mailto:walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 3:34 AM To: public-tracking@w3.org Subject: RE: Audience Measurement Permitted Use (ISSUE-25) On 2014-09-11 12:20, Shane M Wiley wrote: > I believe we already have a broad statement (which some believe is > unnecessary) that states nothing in the TCS is meant to contradict > local laws. Adding another non-normative statement to this FACT is > wasteful and unnecessary. I disagree. We have such a broad statement since the group has chosen not to harmonise at the level of protection of the vast majority of the industrialised world as well since it is not feasible to check every bit of the compliance specification with every jurisdiction on the planet. Having that statement does not take away from the utility of pointing out that a specific permitted use is not a permitted use in the context of the jurisdiction of one of the largest economies when we already know it doesn't. That is not wasteful, that is helpful. Regards, Walter
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 10:40:28 UTC