Agenda for June 18 TPWG call

This week we will go to Call for Objections on ISSUE-170 and have two 
new items on the agenda (items 4 and 5).
Please refer to the wiki main page for the list of issues that are 
currently up for discussion and their progress: 
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG#Change_proposals

AGENDA:
----------------------------------

Confirmation of scribe. Volunteers welcome!

Offline-caller-identification (see end for instructions)

----------------------------------
--- Issues for this Call ---

1. _*Data Append and First Parties*_

ISSUE-170: Definition of and what/whether limitations around data append 
and first parties
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/170
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_First_Party_Compliance
June 18: M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine 
consensus

2. _*Context Separation*_

ISSUE-219: Context Separation - Limitations on use in a 3rd party 
context of data collected in a 1st party context
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/219
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Limitations_on_use_in_Third_Party_Context 

June 18: M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion 
whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal

3. _*Data Minimization*_
This topic includes an array of related issues.

ISSUE-31: Minimization - to what extent will minimization be required 
for use of a particular exemption? (conditional exemptions)
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/31
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposals_on_data_minimization
June 18: M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion 
whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal

Together with:
ISSUE-199: Limitations on the use of unique identifiers
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/199
ISSUE-211: Should we specify retention periods (extended with 
transparency) for permitted uses?
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/211
ISSUE-220: Proportionality should be across the board
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/220
ISSUE-233: Data Minimization, Retention and Transparency
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/233

4. _*Use of "tracking" in compliance*_

ISSUE-203: Use of "tracking" in third-party compliance
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/203
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Tracking_Third_Party_Compliance
June 18: M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All 
change proposals should be drafted

5. _*Link shorteners/ID providers*_

ISSUE-97: Re-direction, shortened URLs, click analytics -- what kind of 
tracking is this?
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/97
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposals_on_link_shorteners_and_ID_providers
June 18: M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All 
change proposals should be drafted

Together with:
ISSUE-99: How does DNT work with identity providers?
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/99


================ Summary Documentation on Resolving ISSUES 
=================

PHASES to resolve issues:
M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All change 
proposals should be drafted
M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; 
Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals
M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether 
clear consensus emerges for one change proposal
M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus
M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks after 
M3); Analysis starts
M7 (announcement): Results are announced

================ Infrastructure =================

Zakim teleconference bridge:
VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225)
IRC Chat: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt

OFFLINE caller identification:
If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your
phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call
(command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in my
case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of time. If you are not
comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone number,
please email your name and phone number to
npdoty@w3.org<mailto:npdoty@w3.org>. We want to reduce (in fact,
eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note
that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to
off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.