- From: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 15:34:03 +0000
- To: Ninja Marnau <ninja@w3.org>, Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@btinternet.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, 'Jack Hobaugh' <jack@networkadvertising.org>
I thought we had previously agreed to remove terms like "comprehensively" as they are highly subjective. "Clear" should be more than enough as it embodies that the fullness of a concept was appropriately conveyed for it to be "clear" (and carries enough ambiguity on its own). - Shane -----Original Message----- From: Ninja Marnau [mailto:ninja@w3.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 8:29 AM To: Mike O'Neill; public-tracking@w3.org; 'Jack Hobaugh' Subject: Re: issue-170 Mike, I updated your proposal in the wiki. Jack, do you think the text proposal is now more balanced for DNT;0 and UGE? Ninja Am 04.06.14 14:38, schrieb Mike O'Neill: > If a 1st Party receives a request with DNT:0 set then data regarding the user MAY be used or shared but, if the header signal resulted from an explicitly-granted exception, only for the purposes that were clearly and comprehensively explained when the exception was granted.
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2014 15:35:07 UTC