- From: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:21:31 +0100
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/01/2014 01:21, Nicholas Doty wrote: > Hi John, > > I've tried to clarify what I believe to be the interpretation of > the current editors' draft text on past calls and in past email: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2013Nov/0088.html How > should we read the following bit: "There is no required user interface for the user agent; user agents MAY choose to provide no user interface regarding user-granted exceptions." To me it reads as if the editor's draft makes the UGE optional. I'd like to have this clarified before the call for objection closes. Regards, Walter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLSiMsACgkQLgMH1kRJfHt5FwCeJpud+39t5l6ozy4oojBo3MET gtoAoMii0BykprsSc3I1kfdiRjYN7Hrm =BPkK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sunday, 12 January 2014 12:22:01 UTC