- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:32:21 -0700
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org List" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Sep 23, 2013, at 11:39 AM, David Singer wrote: > Hi Vinay, friends > > Matthias asked me to take a look, as one of the editing team, and suggest what was editorial and what you should probably raise an issue about. The goal of this short-term exercise is to fix at least some of the editorial mistakes that were made in crafting the June draft, including the arbitrary addition of non-editorial text, that should have been fixed prior to WD publication just like we have for all of our prior WDs. In other words, there are editorial ways to address the objections to publication of the WD, and accomplishing that in short order is what was promised by the chair. Those changes are not necessarily editorial in nature. The fix is either to change the text as requested, add a parallel option text in the draft (with option boxes), or remove the current text from the draft pending issue resolution. If it is editorial (and most are), then changing the text is easiest. Otherwise, I prefer options boxes over removing the old text, since the latter causes more editorial churn. ....Roy
Received on Monday, 23 September 2013 20:32:45 UTC