Re: Revise network interaction definition issue-217 issue-228

Thanks Nick,

Partly. The comment made was that a definition for a 'network 
interaction' could stand on itself without the additional definitions of 
'user action' and/or 'subrequest'.


Nicholas Doty schreef op 2013-11-25 03:01:
> I haven't seen any additional suggestions/revisions on the network
> interaction definition(s). To a question that came up on the call,
> I've added what I believe to be a friendly clarification to both
> proposals on the wiki [0], namely that if a term isn't ultimately used
> in a document, then we wouldn't keep the (apparently unnecessary)
> definition. I hope that addresses the concerns raised by Rob and Mike.
> Thanks,
> Nick
> [0]

Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 09:32:04 UTC