W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Revise network interaction definition issue-217 issue-228

From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:31:31 +0100
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Message-ID: <2b3924ae9a2b22b9b671f7262d4f2e97@xs4all.nl>
Thanks Nick,

Partly. The comment made was that a definition for a 'network 
interaction' could stand on itself without the additional definitions of 
'user action' and/or 'subrequest'.

Rob

Nicholas Doty schreef op 2013-11-25 03:01:
> I haven't seen any additional suggestions/revisions on the network
> interaction definition(s). To a question that came up on the call,
> I've added what I believe to be a friendly clarification to both
> proposals on the wiki [0], namely that if a term isn't ultimately used
> in a document, then we wouldn't keep the (apparently unnecessary)
> definition. I hope that addresses the concerns raised by Rob and Mike.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick
> 
> [0]
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Revise_network_interaction_definition
Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 09:32:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:20 UTC