W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Call for Objections on ISSUES -16 and -204 (definitions of collect/retain/use/share/facilitates collection)

From: Jack L. Hobaugh Jr <jack@networkadvertising.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:02:10 -0500
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9DDD7AF8-55EA-42F8-8C89-33FEFB81A2ED@networkadvertising.org>
To: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
Hi Matthias,

Thank you for your quick response.

I agree with you that my request was not raised as a formal option.  But the equivalent to my request was added to the ISSUE-10 call for objections as follows:





And “Document location” was also not a formal option raised for ISSUE-10 but it was still included in the ISSUE-10 call for objections.

To be consistent, if it made sense to add “Document location" to ISSUE-10, it should also make sense to add a “Document location” section to each call for objections in which a TCS definition is proposed to be ported into the TPE.

Best regards,

Jack

Jack L. Hobaugh Jr
Network Advertising Initiative | Counsel & Senior Director of Technology 
1634 Eye St. NW, Suite 750 Washington, DC 20006
P: 202-347-5341 | jack@networkadvertising.org





On Nov 14, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org> wrote:

> Hi Jack,
> 
> 
> thanks a lot for this input.
> 
> As far as I know, this option was not raised as one of the alternatives for this call for objections and therefore was not part of the Wiki and is not not present as an option for this call for objections. If we overlooked a message, feel free to point us to the right place in the archive. 
> 
> In any case, you can object to both alternatives stating why you cannot live with either of the alternatives that are document. You should also state that you prefer these terms to remain undefined.
> 
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> matthias
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 14/11/2013 17:56, Jack L. Hobaugh Jr wrote:
>> Hi Justin,
>> 
>> I noticed that the page available via the link below does not contain a section that would allow a TPWG participant to object to adding these definitions to the TPE as is available in the Issue-10 call for objections page.
>> 
>> I respectfully request that this section be added.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Jack
>> 
>> Jack L. Hobaugh Jr
>> Network Advertising Initiative | Counsel & Senior Director of Technology 
>> 1634 Eye St. NW, Suite 750 Washington, DC 20006
>> P: 202-347-5341 | jack@networkadvertising.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 13, 2013, at 6:02 PM, Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Announcing the Call for Objections on the definitions of collect, retain, use, share, and facilitate collection.
>>> 
>>> Objections may be submitted on this form: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/tpwg-collect-204/
>>> 
>>> Please let me know if there are any errors or questions and I will try to remedy as quickly as possible.
>>> 
>>> Due to the Thanksgiving holiday in the United States, we are extending the Call for Objections for an extra week to December 4th.
>>> 
>>> Justin Brookman
>>> Director, Consumer Privacy
>>> Center for Democracy & Technology
>>> tel 202.407.8812
>>> justin@cdt.org
>>> http://www.cdt.org
>>> @JustinBrookman
>>> @CenDemTech
>>> 
>> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 18:02:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:20 UTC