- From: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:25:13 +0000
- To: Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- CC: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
2-weeks from the formal email is the 22nd. - Shane -----Original Message----- From: Nicholas Doty [mailto:npdoty@w3.org] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 2:14 PM To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org) Cc: Justin Brookman Subject: [Call for Objections] Party definitions Hello WG, As discussed on the teleconference this week, we're issuing a Call for Objections on ISSUE-10 regarding the definition or definitions of parties. If you have an objection to one or more of these proposed options, please describe your objection via this poll with clear and specific reasoning. (The final question also provides an option to explain reasoning for any objection to including definitions in the TPE as well as Compliance documents.) The purpose of the poll is not to gather a count. https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/tpwg-party-10/ The poll is open now, and will close on November 20th, as mentioned on the teleconference. Thanks, Nick (for Justin) (BCC public-tracking-announce for those not following public-tracking closely)
Received on Friday, 8 November 2013 21:26:11 UTC