W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > November 2013

RE: Call for objections

From: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 21:23:50 +0000
To: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>, John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
CC: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DCCF036E573F0142BD90964789F720E3141EC830@GQ1-MB01-02.y.corp.yahoo.com>
Justin,

Did an email go out calling for the CFO and providing the links at that time?  I believe the 2-week clock should start then.  Fair?  This is the process that Matthias had agreed to (email with CFO, 2 weeks from that point).

- Shane

From: Justin Brookman [mailto:jbrookman@cdt.org]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 2:19 PM
To: John Simpson
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
Subject: Re: Call for objections

The options were presented to the group on the call on November 6th --- it took us a couple of days to get the options up, but I'd like to stick with the original deadline of November 20th (as was announced on the call and previously).  CFO on ISSUE-10 is here<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/tpwg-party-10/>, ISSUE-5 should be up soon.

On Nov 8, 2013, at 4:14 PM, John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org<mailto:john@consumerwatchdog.org>> wrote:


Chairs,

Shouldn't there be a call for objections posted for Issue-6 and Issue-10?  I understood they were to be posted on Nov. 6 and closed on Nov. 20.  Since it's Nov. 7 and they still aren't posted, does that mean the closing date gets pushed back?

Regards,
John
Received on Friday, 8 November 2013 21:25:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:20 UTC