I sent a correction earlier, but I think our emails crossed. In case you did not notice, I am talking about a very short time, perhaps on the order of 48 hours, not 53 weeks, to allow the system to determine whether an OOBC exists. Another difference is that the OOBC-not-found condition might trigger a normal, DNT-compatible de-identification of the data from non-OOBC users, rather than a discard of all of that data. That is a minor difference from a DNT perspective, but I want to be clear. --ronan On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:53 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 22, 2013, at 10:45 , John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org> > wrote: > > > If David's characterization of what Ronan is seeking is correct, I'd > suggest the practice would be incompatible with DNT:1 > > I kinda hope I am wrong… >
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 19:07:45 UTC