W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > March 2013

Re: TPE Handling Out-of-Band Consent (including ISSUE-152)

From: Ronan Heffernan <ronansan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:06:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHyiW9J9m_wS0-AWn0L3vYORKM=gvmoQNw1Sv=rkiHj6E4pPWQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Cc: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, public-tracking@w3.org, Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
I sent a correction earlier, but I think our emails crossed.  In case you
did not notice, I am talking about a very short time, perhaps on the order
of 48 hours, not 53 weeks, to allow the system to determine whether an OOBC
exists.  Another difference is that the OOBC-not-found condition might
trigger a normal, DNT-compatible de-identification of the data from
non-OOBC users, rather than a discard of all of that data.  That is a minor
difference from a DNT perspective, but I want to be clear.


On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:53 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:

> On Mar 22, 2013, at 10:45 , John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
> wrote:
> > If David's characterization  of what Ronan is seeking is correct, I'd
> suggest the practice would be incompatible with DNT:1
> I kinda hope I am wrong…
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 19:07:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:07 UTC