W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > March 2013

Re: RE: Approach to ISSUE-167: Multiple site exception

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:51:03 +0100
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
Message-ID: <4096941.MyeCHQ1bI4@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
On Monday 18 March 2013 17:58:07 Shane Wiley wrote:
> There is a question of timing and what the current draft already
> supports.  If UAs in the WG are already implementing the current
> draft, then we have the TSV of "1" from a 3rd party covering some of
> our needs here (UA -> DNT:1, Server -> Tk:1;URI).  While technically,
> to covers Ed's points, the domain will be seen as a 3rd party domain,
> as long as the Server appropriately replies it's indeed a 1st party,
> then both the UA and the user know that domain considers itself
> within the 1st party context.

Yet another point where DNT breaks if the browser doesn't look at the 
feedback loop (status). How can the browser react appropriately (and let 
the cookies through) if it doesn't read the feedback, namely that the 
site claims to be a first party. (see discussion on ACTION-258) I don't 
think it is wise to store an exception for this case. If the service 
then switches back to 3rd party context, it would keep the exception 
stored despite the change of context. 

Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 07:51:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:07 UTC