- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:51:03 +0100
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
On Monday 18 March 2013 17:58:07 Shane Wiley wrote: > There is a question of timing and what the current draft already > supports. If UAs in the WG are already implementing the current > draft, then we have the TSV of "1" from a 3rd party covering some of > our needs here (UA -> DNT:1, Server -> Tk:1;URI). While technically, > to covers Ed's points, the domain will be seen as a 3rd party domain, > as long as the Server appropriately replies it's indeed a 1st party, > then both the UA and the user know that domain considers itself > within the 1st party context. Yet another point where DNT breaks if the browser doesn't look at the feedback loop (status). How can the browser react appropriately (and let the cookies through) if it doesn't read the feedback, namely that the site claims to be a first party. (see discussion on ACTION-258) I don't think it is wise to store an exception for this case. If the service then switches back to 3rd party context, it would keep the exception stored despite the change of context. --Rigo
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 07:51:31 UTC