- From: Ronan Heffernan <ronansan@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:43:50 -0400
- To: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHyiW9K3pqn5FfvBnTc4fV+_kTWcE5j4MWGtMtRtH1GyJj0Vhw@mail.gmail.com>
Matthias, It would be possible to provide a page that would allow users to see if a company thinks that it has consent, though if there is a large delay in coordinating with agent data, fulfilling the request could take a rather long time (as in 24-hours) to be certain that all coordination steps were complete. The user could submit a query and then return the next day to find out their status. Such a control page might not be able to allow actual "control", depending on contracts. --ronan On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) < mts-std@schunter.org> wrote: > Hi Justin, > > > IMHO the point here is what "real-time" means in the different scenarios. > > If we assume that finding the out of band consent is a non-trivial > database query and takes -say- 3 seconds. > > Then these 3 seconds can be spend during batch cleanup overnight > (discarding all data where you were unable to ensure that you have out of > band consent). It is also fine for a user to wait some seconds while seeing > a hour-glass "please wait until we have retrieved our data" at the > "control" web-page. However, waiting for 3 seconds before responding to an > http request will make the site very unresponsive. > > Does this answer your question? > > btw: I did not understand either what role the client-side UA plays (if > any). > > > Regards, > matthias >
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 13:44:38 UTC