- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:36:51 +0100
- To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
- CC: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
ISSUE-167: Multiple site exceptions http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/167 Hi Team (and in particular Shane and Mike), I have re-read the minutes and it seems to be that the right approach forward to ISSUE-167 (albeit not perfect) is to leave the API as it is for final call and then understand the implementation experiences. We can then design a backward compatible way to add MultiSiteExceptions later. One challenge to overcome is that we need to ensure that the envisioned method is secure, i.e., that one can only ask for exceptions for sites that one owns/controls. Formally, I suggest to document this and mark ISSUE-167 as POSTPONED. Are you OK with this way forward? Regards, matthias
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 15:37:21 UTC