W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > March 2013

Approach to ISSUE-167: Multiple site exception

From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:36:51 +0100
Message-ID: <51473493.5050200@schunter.org>
To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
CC: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
ISSUE-167: Multiple site exceptions

Hi Team (and in particular Shane and Mike),

I have re-read the minutes and it seems to be that the right approach 
forward to ISSUE-167 (albeit not perfect)
is to leave the API as it is for final call and then understand the 
implementation experiences.

We can then design a backward compatible way to add MultiSiteExceptions 
One challenge to overcome is that we need to ensure that the envisioned 
method is secure, i.e., that one can only ask for exceptions for sites 
that one owns/controls.

Formally, I suggest to document this and mark ISSUE-167 as POSTPONED. 
Are you OK with this way forward?

Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 15:37:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:07 UTC