Re: DNT: Agenda for Call March 6

Peter,

I have 3 procedural questions: 

Action 273 is pending review, however the revised text has not been circulated to the list. I think it is fair to leave at least 1 week between text circulation on the mailing list and discussing it in the plenairy weekly calls to allow for discussion on the list and to allow for the  need to discuss text internally before taking an official position in a discussion. Is it possible to accomodate this?

Likewise is action 368 with status open, and no text circulated. Ergo, no time/chance to prepare the discussion in time.

Lastly, with regards to apparently scheduled discussions (eg . related append issues to action 368). I may have overlooked a URL, but if there are items planned ahead, it would be good to know. Please send a URL, 

Regards,
Rob


Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net> wrote:

>Wednesday call March 6, 2013
>
>---------------------------
>Administrative
>
>Chair:  Peter Swire
>---------------------------
>
>1.  Confirmation of scribe – glad to accept volunteer in advance
>
>2.  Offline-caller-identification:
>If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your
>phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call
>(command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in
>my case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of  time. If you are
>not comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone
>number, please email your name and phone number to
>npdoty@w3.org<mailto:npdoty@w3.org>. We want to reduce (in fact,
>eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note
>that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to
>off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.
>
>3. Update on next face-to-face.
>
>---------------------------
>TPE: Matthias Schunter
>---------------------------
>
>4.   TPE matters (15 minutes)
>
>---------------------------
>
>Discuss Assigned Compliance Actions
>
>---------------------------
>
>5.  Action 273 (Rob Sherman).  Rob has updated text for multiple first
>parties.  Discussion will include reference to “joint marketing” under
>Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
>
>6. Action 368 (Chris Pedigo), update “service provider” or “data
>processor” definition.  (Discussion of related “append” issue is
>scheduled to occur in two weeks).
>
>7. Action 371 (Dan Auerbach).  Dan has circulated proposed text and
>non-normative language.
>
>8.  Issue 10, definition of “first party.”  Text from the editors, with
>focus on clarity of writing rather than major discussion on scope.
>
>9. If time, review of other outstanding assigned actions.
>
>---------------------------
>
>10.  Announce next meeting & adjourn
>
>
>================ Infrastructure =================
>
>Zakim teleconference bridge:
>VoIP:    sip:zakim@voip.w3.org<file:///sip/zakim@voip.w3.org>
>Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225)
>IRC Chat: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt
>
>*****
>
>*****
>
>
>
>Professor Peter P. Swire
>C. William O'Neill Professor of Law
>    Ohio State University
>240.994.4142
>www.peterswire.net
>
>
>
>Professor Peter P. Swire
>C. William O'Neill Professor of Law
>    Ohio State University
>240.994.4142
>www.peterswire.net