Re: June Change Proposal: Partial Compliance

Yep, thanks.


On Sunday, June 30, 2013, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 2013-06-26, at 08:54 +0200, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > I would propose we add this text:
> >> A website MAY NOT be in partial compliance with the TPE or TCS
> documents.
>
> Editorial clarification: There is no such thing as "MAY NOT."  Do you mean
> "MUST NOT"?
>
> >> Example: A website is testing support for the TPE protocol by
> connecting it to a proprietary compliance standard.  It must not represent
> compliance with "Do Not Track" unless it adheres to the requirements of
> both TPE and TCS.
> >
>
>