- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:00:39 +0200
- To: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On 2013-06-26, at 08:54 +0200, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu> wrote: > I would propose we add this text: >> A website MAY NOT be in partial compliance with the TPE or TCS documents. Editorial clarification: There is no such thing as "MAY NOT." Do you mean "MUST NOT"? >> Example: A website is testing support for the TPE protocol by connecting it to a proprietary compliance standard. It must not represent compliance with "Do Not Track" unless it adheres to the requirements of both TPE and TCS. >
Received on Sunday, 30 June 2013 10:00:41 UTC