- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:39:06 +0200
- To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>, Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
On Wednesday 19 June 2013 02:58:25 Shane Wiley wrote: > I believe by pairing the OOBC with the control link, we've removed the > likelihood of false options for users. If a company were to really > want to make it hard to reverse an OOBC, they would attempt to hide > it from the user and use other persistent means of storing the user's > consent. I believe places OOBC and UGE in a central location for > users is a far better outcome in all cases. Fine and convinced (don't know about Rob though). But does this address the transformation of UGE into OOBC and the other way around? I think the transition, if possible, needs some guidance in the text. --Rigo
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 09:39:41 UTC