W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2013

Re: ACTION-408 - security & fraud proposed text - Section 6.2.

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:18:19 -0700
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, W3C DNT Working Group Mailing List <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-id: <933BC4F2-CDAA-46E9-8853-EA8425C8EE84@apple.com>
To: Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net>

On Jun 13, 2013, at 20:46 , Chris Mejia <chris.mejia@iab.net> wrote:

> CM:  Good catch on the word invalid in the heading-- that should have been
> changed in the subject line to "disingenuous". 

This is at least an odd word to use.  

"lacking in frankness, candor, or sincerity; falsely or hypocritically ingenuous; insincere: Her excuse was rather disingenuous."


"I didn't give you my seat because I didn't realize that you are a senior citizen."  She's pretending to be naive, but is in fact simply self-centred; this is falsely ingenuous.

How this applies to web traffic currently defeats me.  Is it a technical term of art used in the security industry?

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Saturday, 15 June 2013 00:19:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:39:42 UTC