Re: Batch closing of TPE related issues

I agree - sorry for the mixup.


On 12/06/2013 17:54, Shane Wiley wrote:
>
> Matthias,
>
>
> The term we've used for the last 2 years has been OOBC. OOBE is a new 
> term and I'd rather stick with Consent in this case.
>
> - Shane
>
> *From:*Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) 
> [mailto:mts-std@schunter.org]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 12, 2013 8:43 AM
> *To:* Heffernan, Ronan
> *Cc:* Nicholas Doty; Shane Wiley; Rob van Eijk; public-tracking@w3.org 
> (public-tracking@w3.org)
> *Subject:* Re: Batch closing of TPE related issues
>
> My mistake - terminology mixup. Let's keep the existing term OOBE
>
> On 12/06/2013 12:13, Heffernan, Ronan wrote:
>
>     Matthias,
>
>     You reference OOBE (Out-of-Band Exception?), where we have usually
>     discussed OOBC (Out-of-Band Consent).  Are these two distinct
>     concepts?  There will be third-parties that cannot use the UGE API
>     (especially if they are forbidden by the first party to send
>     JavaScript to the UA), so they will have to be able to use OOBC
>     with no attempt to create a UGE.
>
>     --ronan
>