- From: Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 06:35:41 -0700
- To: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CDDB4E2E.8C6C0%peter@peterswire.net>
OK, my thanks for the clarification. Peter Prof. Peter P. Swire C. William O'Neill Professor of Law Ohio State University 240.994.4142 www.peterswire.net Beginning August 2013: Nancy J. and Lawrence P. Huang Professor Law and Ethics Program Scheller College of Business Georgia Institute of Technology From: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com<mailto:achapell@chapellassociates.com>> Date: Monday, June 10, 2013 9:32 AM To: Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net<mailto:peter@peterswire.net>>, "public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>" <public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>> Subject: Re: Action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers Hi Peter – This was raised on last week's call. I was asked to come up with language for the TPE, not the compliance doc. From: Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net<mailto:peter@peterswire.net>> Date: Monday, June 10, 2013 9:26 AM To: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com<mailto:achapell@chapellassociates.com>>, "public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>" <public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>> Subject: Re: Action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>> Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:27:25 +0000 Alan: Thank you for sending. As a process matter, I think it makes sense to consider this and other text proposals as proposed amendments to the June Draft. Peter Prof. Peter P. Swire C. William O'Neill Professor of Law Ohio State University 240.994.4142 www.peterswire.net Beginning August 2013: Nancy J. and Lawrence P. Huang Professor Law and Ethics Program Scheller College of Business Georgia Institute of Technology From: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com<mailto:achapell@chapellassociates.com>> Date: Monday, June 10, 2013 9:22 AM To: "public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>" <public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>> Subject: Action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers Resent-From: <public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>> Resent-Date: Monday, June 10, 2013 9:23 AM Here is my suggestion for language pursuant to Action 231. A user agent MUST have a default tracking preference of unset (DNT is not enabled; no tracking preference signal is sent). A user agent extension or add-on must not alter the user's tracking preference setting unless it complies with Section 5 of this document (User Preferences). Software outside of the user agent that causes a DNT header to be sent (or modifies existing headers) MUST NOT do so without following the requirements of this section; such software also MUST ensure the expressed preference reflects the individual user's intent. Alan
Received on Monday, 10 June 2013 13:36:10 UTC