W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Action for ISSUE-112: Sub-domain and cookie-like rules

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:22:54 +0100
Cc: Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org> (Intel Corporation), "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-id: <36279F02-E445-49F2-BBC9-8C72668C978D@apple.com>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>

On Jan 21, 2013, at 19:20 , Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:

> * David Singer wrote:
>> interface NavigatorDoNotTrack
>> {
>>   integer storeSiteSpecificTrackingException (optional sequence<DOMString> arrayOfSameParty, optional sequence<DOMString> arrayOfTargets, optional optional siteName, optional optional explanationString, optional optional detailURI);
>> };
> 
> For what it is worth, you can expect to be told to use a "dictionary"
> parameter instead of positional arguments for this, so authors can call
> this like `storeSiteSpecificTrackingException({ siteName: ..., ... })`.

yes, good idea.  Nick may also help me on the best practices for script design.  I hope.

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 09:23:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:39:18 UTC