ISSUE-64 Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up from Rigo Wenning on 2012-11-19 (public-tracking@w3.org from November 2012)

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:17:14 +0100
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: Rob Sherman <robsherman@fb.com>, "Amy Colando (LCA)" <acolando@microsoft.com>, "Aleecia M. McDonald" <aleecia@aleecia.com>
Message-ID: <6180625.KTYUKSSsvm@hegel.sophia.w3.org>

On Wednesday 14 November 2012 15:40:25 Rob Sherman wrote:
> It seems imprudent to effectively define consent for this limited
> purpose before we resolve what we're doing with it more broadly.

The definition of consent is needed for global considerations as well 
as DNT:0 is supposed to deliver consent to data collection. This 
will affect the discussion as I don't think we can have a number of 
definitions of consent. 

Rigo

Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 12:17:47 UTC