Re: ACTION-286: Propose DAA text regarding de-identification (for unlinkability discussion)

On 11/15/12 11:35 AM, Lauren Gelman wrote:
> So Jonathan's definition is cleaner because it gives industry a bright 
> line definition of how to comply-- which I know my clients prefer. 
>  But my sense is that both accomplish the same thing.
I disagree that it's cleaner. But that aside, my question to proponents 
of Jonathan's definition is whether you believe the efforts required to 
unlink data, and the subsequent loss of value of the data, should be 
proportionate to the risks associated with the data. If so, what's your 
measure of the proportionality?

Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 17:36:15 UTC