Re: ACTION-212: Draft text on how user agents must obtain consent to turn on a DNT signal

On Friday 02 November 2012 03:05:36 Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> If we want these servers to be compliant with DNT, we have to
> allow them to communicate non-compliance in specific instances
> without implying non-compliance in all instances.

Hear, Hear! Looks like a feature that we may want to discuss. What 
about opening an issue? 

I would suggest to add a status to 5.2 that introduces state "T": 

 T   <strong>Ignoring</strong>: The designated resource believes
     it has not received a valid DNT header and will behave as
     if no DNT header was sent. 

Would that work?


Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 10:35:09 UTC