Re: action-190

* Ian Fette wrote:
>Thanks for the summary Aleecia. What you describe as "C" around allowed
>uses is the thing that I'm having trouble figuring out how we pull off.
>Presumably, once the logs are processed and in their final resting place,
>you have to be able to stand up to an audit / inquiry of some sort. "prove
>to me you're honoring whatever commitments you made w.r.t. DNT". If we have
>strict requirements from time zero " a data collector MUST NOT use the data
>for purposes other than those allowed outside of the six week period." then
>what have we gained? If I have to be able to make the same assertions from
>time zero that I would have to make at time t+6wk, then it seems like there
>is no benefit to the six week period at all, it is fundamentally no
>different from the period after six weeks as best as I can tell.

In order to understand this point, I recommend Ian's earlier messages,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012May/0182.html

  My intent was simply to say "Look. If you're only keeping data for six
  weeks, DNT is REALLY easy for you to comply with. As long as you don't
  use the data to build a model that's used to serve targeted ads to
  users, you're good. If you keep data for more than six weeks, then
  unfortunately life isn't as simple for you, have fun."

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012May/0183.html

  This was really meant as a "If you only log data for six weeks, unless
  you do this one thing (serving OBA ads) you don't have to worry about
  anything, you're compliant with DNT. If you log data for more than six
  weeks, then you have to deal with all of the DNT stuff, have fun."
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2012 01:47:54 UTC