- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:59:02 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Vinay Goel <vigoel@adobe.com>, Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>
Agree, as long as the semantics of what is declared (we accept DNT;0 or 1 etc) remain limited. But we should be clear that someone making that request will be liable for his declarations. This way, A can request for B. But if B doesn't exist I can turn back to A. Rigo On Monday 14 May 2012 08:57:47 Shane Wiley wrote: > Agree with Vinay - I can see appropriate situations where one party may > request a web-wide exception for another party. As was discussed in DC, > it would be better to focus on the technical details (TPE) here so we can > close at least close on the interface.
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 07:59:34 UTC