- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 10:04:57 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
On Sunday 06 May 2012 09:41:42 David Singer wrote: > I thought the consensus in DC was that we would explore having two calls; > that a web-wide exception for a third party would be a separate > call. But the action seems to be telling me that the consensus was > something else. Am I mis-reading the action? I am strongly in favor of flexibility because I believe that it will be of prime importance that businesses can ask the user for permission in whatever context they are. So is there a good reason for the restriction to only allow the call for web-wide exceptions from the origin of the beneficiary of that web-wide exception? Nick, feel free to take that offline, because I feel I don't fully understand the issue. Rigo
Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 08:05:27 UTC