- From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 17:48:52 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
Chris, The text opens up compliance in a later debate on responsibilities, for controller-processor can be seen as a 'same party'. Rob On 4-5-2012 13:26, Rigo Wenning wrote: > Chris, > > yes, but it goes a bit further. My text puts a hint for later debates on > responsibility. If a first party declares things as "same party", they take > responsibility for those. If the other parties declared as "same" misbehave > the semantics are such that this misbehavior is assigned also to the first > party who had declared "same party" for the misbehaving site. > This is to give people an incentive not to declare arbitrary third parties > with lose relations as "same party" because this creates a liability risk. > With my text, a site will only chose those as "same party" that they are in > the same legal bucket and which they trust. > > Hope that helps > > Rigo > > On Friday 04 May 2012 11:15:32 Chris Pedigo wrote: >> Rigo, thanks for taking this on. Is my understanding correct that this >> language simply requires that a site may only claim affiliate sites as >> long as those sites also honor DNT? >
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2012 15:49:19 UTC