- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:55:03 +0100
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
On Wednesday 07 March 2012 12:16:50 Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Given that the protocol is "Do Not Track", this issue has more > substance then the entire rest of the compliance document. Roy, the "Do Not Track" protocol has as much importance for consent making in a market of 480 Million people. So "tracking" is not the only thing we pursue, despite the name. I already said, I like your definition. It's balance is proven by the fact that you get fire from all sides. I agree with Jonathan that we are close if we can figure out the "collection" part. I think by including the usual chatter into your definition, you complicate things. I think we all agree that "tracking" is beyond the collections done for basic http interaction and security. It takes you one sentence to exclude that. Rigo
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 07:55:31 UTC