- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:39:18 -0800
- To: Justin Brookman <jbrookman@cdt.org>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
On Feb 29, 2012, at 7:53 PM, Justin Brookman wrote: > There is already an entire section of the compliance spec on this exact issue --- 4.4.2 Exception for Outsourcing. Is there any reason that exception does not address everyone's concerns, rather than resorting to the fiction that service providers are the same entity as the first party (despite an earlier definition of party that says otherwise)? As I said, that is sufficient IF it is applied to this issue. It doesn't do any good to have a definition of a third party acting as a first party if the other requirements ignore that definition and paint all third parties as the same. ....Roy
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 05:39:43 UTC