W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > July 2012

Re: ISSUE-157: Charter is running out and we need to agree on whether to extend or recharter and what a revised charter would look like

From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:21:43 -0700
Message-Id: <2806C5ED-D935-4630-A469-E358806B8FE0@consumerwatchdog.org>
Cc: Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
To: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
I agree with JC. Trying to adopt a new charter would divert us from our task of agreeing on the DNT specifications and delay our efforts.  We're already substantially behind schedule on developing the standard.
John

On Jul 18, 2012, at 9:54 AM, JC Cannon wrote:

> I feel we should extend the charter without changes.
> 
> JC
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:51 AM
> To: public-tracking@w3.org
> Subject: ISSUE-157: Charter is running out and we need to agree on whether to extend or recharter and what a revised charter would look like
> 
> ISSUE-157: Charter is running out and we need to agree on whether to extend or recharter and what a revised charter would look like
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/157
> 
> Raised by: 
> On product: 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

----------
John M. Simpson
Consumer Advocate
Consumer Watchdog
1750 Ocean Park Blvd. ,Suite 200
Santa Monica, CA,90405
Tel: 310-392-7041
Cell: 310-292-1902
www.ConsumerWatchdog.org
john@consumerwatchdog.org
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 18:21:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:53 UTC