- From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:21:43 -0700
- To: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 18:21:45 UTC
I agree with JC. Trying to adopt a new charter would divert us from our task of agreeing on the DNT specifications and delay our efforts. We're already substantially behind schedule on developing the standard. John On Jul 18, 2012, at 9:54 AM, JC Cannon wrote: > I feel we should extend the charter without changes. > > JC > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:51 AM > To: public-tracking@w3.org > Subject: ISSUE-157: Charter is running out and we need to agree on whether to extend or recharter and what a revised charter would look like > > ISSUE-157: Charter is running out and we need to agree on whether to extend or recharter and what a revised charter would look like > > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/157 > > Raised by: > On product: > > > > > > ---------- John M. Simpson Consumer Advocate Consumer Watchdog 1750 Ocean Park Blvd. ,Suite 200 Santa Monica, CA,90405 Tel: 310-392-7041 Cell: 310-292-1902 www.ConsumerWatchdog.org john@consumerwatchdog.org
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 18:21:45 UTC