RE: ISSUE-157: Charter is running out and we need to agree on whether to extend or recharter and what a revised charter would look like from Shane Wiley on 2012-07-18 (public-tracking@w3.org from July 2012)

From: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:57:21 -0700
To: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>, Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <63294A1959410048A33AEE161379C8023D19E6295E@SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com>

JC,

I would recommend that the TPL discussion be removed in a re-chartering event.

- Shane

-----Original Message-----
From: JC Cannon [mailto:jccannon@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:55 AM
To: Tracking Protection Working Group
Subject: RE: ISSUE-157: Charter is running out and we need to agree on whether to extend or recharter and what a revised charter would look like

I feel we should extend the charter without changes.

JC

-----Original Message-----
From: Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:51 AM
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-157: Charter is running out and we need to agree on whether to extend or recharter and what a revised charter would look like

ISSUE-157: Charter is running out and we need to agree on whether to extend or recharter and what a revised charter would look like

http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/157


Raised by: 
On product:

Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 16:58:14 UTC