W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > August 2012

RE: action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers

From: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:31:28 -0700
To: Tamir Israel <tisrael@cippic.ca>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>
CC: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <63294A1959410048A33AEE161379C8024F8FDD4F71@SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com>
Tamir,

Still "On By Default" :-)

That said, interesting mix of choices: leave DNT On By Default, but also send all of your activity to MSFT and let 3rd parties know your location.

- Shane

-----Original Message-----
From: Tamir Israel [mailto:tisrael@cippic.ca] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 3:23 PM
To: David Singer
Cc: Shane Wiley; public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
Subject: Re: action-231, issue-153 requirements on other software that sets DNT headers

Here's a screenshot.

Again, I personally agree there are problems with relying on this type of mechanism as 'express user preference', but in spite of that, it is commonly used in a lot of contexts.

Second, I'm wondering if people feel that by rejecting this approach, we are veering into UI-constraint land?

On 8/22/2012 6:15 PM, David Singer wrote:
> Perhaps we should wait to see the actual product; we may be off into hypothetical weeds here.
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 22:32:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:54 UTC