- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 01:54:56 -0700
- To: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Aug 7, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/61
> ISSUE-61: A site could publish a list of the other domains that are associated with them
> RESOLUTION:
> - "partners" attribute at the well-known URI identifies partner sites (Section 5.4.1)
I would like to change the attribute name to "third-party", but
that should not impact resolving the above issue.
Also, we can talk next week about resolving
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/137
ISSUE-137: Does hybrid tracking status need to distinguish between first party (1)
and outsourcing service provider acting as a first party (S)
RESOLUTION:
- No, in practice there may be dozens of service providers on any given request.
Instead, we have added a requirement to identify the responsible first party.
If the designated resource is operated by a service provider acting as a
first party, then the responsible first party is identified by the policy link,
if provided, or the owner of the origin server domain.
- This satisfies Ed's use case of distinguishing between a service provider
acting for some other site and the same service provider acting on one of
its own sites.
....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2012 08:55:18 UTC