- From: Kimon Zorbas <vp@iabeurope.eu>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 19:06:38 +0000
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- CC: "Amy Colando (LCA)" <acolando@microsoft.com>, "Shane Wiley (yahoo)" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
I can get you a letter IAB Europe received on this. Kind regards, Kimon ----- Reply message ----- From: "Rigo Wenning" <rigo@w3.org> To: "Kimon Zorbas" <vp@iabeurope.eu> Cc: "Amy Colando (LCA)" <acolando@microsoft.com>, "Shane Wiley (yahoo)" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, "David Wainberg" <dwainberg@appnexus.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "Jonathan Mayer" <jmayer@stanford.edu> Subject: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests Date: Wed, Nov 9, 2011 20:05 Kimon, this is a very important statement. Do you have a pointer to the CNIL's opinion here? Because if the CNIL (who was always rather strict) is excluding analytics, that may set also goals for our work here and change the lines along the (inherent) conflict we are trying to balance in the compliance specification. Best, Rigo On Monday 07 November 2011 10:46:41 Kimon Zorbas wrote: > In general, those exceptions apply to services for which the first party is > responsible, as e.g. is the case with web analytics (following here CNIL’s > position, the French data protection authority).
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 19:07:15 UTC