Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests from Rigo Wenning on 2011-11-09 (public-tracking@w3.org from November 2011)

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:09:10 +0100
To: Kimon Zorbas <vp@iabeurope.eu>
Cc: "Amy Colando (LCA)" <acolando@microsoft.com>, "Shane Wiley (yahoo)" <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <1930625.1Q9MSEbmQ1@longtarin>

Kimon, 

this is a very important statement. Do you have a pointer to the CNIL's 
opinion here? Because if the CNIL (who was always rather strict) is excluding 
analytics, that may set also goals for our work here and change the lines 
along the (inherent) conflict we are trying to balance in the compliance 
specification. 

Best, 

Rigo

On Monday 07 November 2011 10:46:41 Kimon Zorbas wrote:
> In general, those exceptions apply to services for which the first party is
> responsible, as e.g. is the case with web analytics (following here CNIL’s
> position, the French data protection authority).

Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 19:05:56 UTC