- From: Aleecia M. McDonald <aleecia@aleecia.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 15:50:12 -0800
- To: "public-tracking@w3.org WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
I'm not convinced it would be that hard to get a group decision to change titles only on the call tomorrow. I am also not convinced I understand what difference it makes either way… if you can both make the call tomorrow perhaps we can take that up quickly. Aleecia On Nov 8, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Karl, > > The working group made a decision. That decision is partly based on > the name and title. We are not going to revisit that decision just because > you have a preference. Sorry, but it is too late. Even if I agreed with > your preference, we would still be required to have the WG make another > formal decision regarding publication -- it is not a trivial change > because it would require a new call for consensus, not because it would be > hard to make as editor. > > …Roy > > On Nov 8, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Karl Dubost wrote: > >> >> Le 8 nov. 2011 à 15:47, Roy T. Fielding a écrit : >>> and the TPE short name is supposed to contain dnt because that is the >>> public handle for what we are doing >> >> >> On the client side, it is indeed "DNT". The *WG* Tracking Syntax specification [1] >> is containing more than that. >> >> * The client request header >> 4.1 DNT request header field >> * the DOM interface >> 4.2 HTML DOM Interfaces >> * The server answer >> 5. Communicating a Tracking Status >> >> 1. I would agree with you if we were dealing *only* with the client side. >> 2. Second, it's a minor issue to fix now. It would have more consequences later. >> 3. It doesn't delay the publication of documents. (I can even make the changes if >> it's too much work for you). >> >> >> [1]: http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html >> >> -- >> Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ >> Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 23:50:47 UTC