- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:22:34 -0800
- To: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Karl, The working group made a decision. That decision is partly based on the name and title. We are not going to revisit that decision just because you have a preference. Sorry, but it is too late. Even if I agreed with your preference, we would still be required to have the WG make another formal decision regarding publication -- it is not a trivial change because it would require a new call for consensus, not because it would be hard to make as editor. …Roy On Nov 8, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Karl Dubost wrote: > > Le 8 nov. 2011 à 15:47, Roy T. Fielding a écrit : >> and the TPE short name is supposed to contain dnt because that is the >> public handle for what we are doing > > > On the client side, it is indeed "DNT". The *WG* Tracking Syntax specification [1] > is containing more than that. > > * The client request header > 4.1 DNT request header field > * the DOM interface > 4.2 HTML DOM Interfaces > * The server answer > 5. Communicating a Tracking Status > > 1. I would agree with you if we were dealing *only* with the client side. > 2. Second, it's a minor issue to fix now. It would have more consequences later. > 3. It doesn't delay the publication of documents. (I can even make the changes if > it's too much work for you). > > > [1]: http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html > > -- > Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ > Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software >
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 21:23:32 UTC