- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:50:38 +0200
- To: public-tracking-international@w3.org
- Cc: Haakon Bratsberg <haakonfb@opera.com>
Haakon, On Monday 08 April 2013 14:30:54 Haakon Bratsberg wrote: > Some minor comments: > > - The options in 1.2 is not clear to me (but it might just be me) Not clear was euphemistic. This was double dutch. I had to go back to my initial thoughts and tried to remember what I meant. From there, I added an explanatory remark. Mostly, this is about contextual advertisement and content adaption as a permitted use. This is why I put it there. But this permitted use is not widely accepted, so it may not end up in the TCS and the point is moot. > - I'm not sure if the German implementation of eprivacy directive > should be used as the measurement (as discussed in the Berlin > meeting). I'm ok with as a start, but I'm afraid that we will end > up in a non-consensus situation (= I'm doubtful that industry not > subject to German law will voluntarily "import" the German version) Can you explain where I use the german implementation of the ePrivacy Directive. I'm afflicted with author's blindness. --Rigo
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2013 17:51:07 UTC