- From: CVS User rfieldin <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 22:16:00 +0000
- To: public-tracking-commit@w3.org
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory gil:/tmp/cvs-serv9042
Modified Files:
tracking-dnt.html
Log Message:
ACTION-419, ISSUE-197, ISSUE-161: Describe that the Disregard TSV does not indicate compliance and is only to be used for exceptional conditions
--- /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html 2013/06/05 19:38:36 1.213
+++ /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html 2013/06/05 22:16:00 1.214
@@ -728,9 +728,24 @@
compelled to disregard certain DNT requests to comply with a
local law, regulation, or order.
</p>
+ <p>
+ Note that the <code>D</code> tracking status value does not
+ indicate that the origin server complies with this protocol
+ [[!TRACKING-COMPLIANCE]].
+ It is meant to be used only in situations that can be adequately
+ described to users as an exception to compliance.
+ An origin server that always responds with <code>D</code> is not
+ considered compliant even if that response is compelled by factors
+ beyond the origin server's control.
+ An origin server that responds with <code>D</code> in ways that
+ are inconsistent with their other published and unexpired claims
+ of compliance is likely to be considered misleading.
+ </p>
<p class="issue" data-number="161" title="Do we need a tracking status value for partial compliance or rejecting DNT?">
<b>[PENDING REVIEW]</b> The <code><a>D</a></code> tracking status
- value indicates rejection.
+ value indicates rejection. Note that parts of the last paragraph
+ above are really the domain of TCS, but we can't seem to agree on
+ what the protocol means without mentioning them here.
</p>
</section>
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2013 22:16:05 UTC