- From: CVS User rfieldin <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:19:03 +0000
- To: public-tracking-commit@w3.org
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory gil:/tmp/cvs-serv17951/drafts
Modified Files:
tracking-dnt.html
Log Message:
(editorial) move issue box for ISSUE-161 down to the ! and D sections; add issue box for ISSUE-119 (not tracking) and highlight the N TSV as an option
--- /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html 2013/04/22 20:55:43 1.199
+++ /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html 2013/04/22 21:19:03 1.200
@@ -563,21 +563,20 @@
between a service provider acting for some other site and the same
service provider acting on one of its own sites.
</p>
- <p class="issue" data-number="161" title="Do we need a tracking status value for partial compliance or rejecting DNT?">
- <b>[PENDING REVIEW]</b> See options below for the
- <code><a>!</a></code> and <code><a>D</a></code> tracking status
- values.
- </p>
</section>
- <section id='TSV-N'>
+ <section id='TSV-N' class="option">
<h4>None (N)</h4>
<p>
- A tracking status value of <dfn>N</dfn> means that the origin
+ A tracking status value of <dfn>N</dfn> means the origin
server claims that the designated resource does not perform
tracking of any kind, not even for a <a>permitted use</a>,
and does not make use of any data collected from tracking.
</p>
+ <p class="issue" data-number="119" title='Specify "absolutely not tracking"'>
+ <b>[OPEN]</b> The <code><a>N</a></code> tracking status
+ value corresponds to this notion of absolutely not tracking.
+ </p>
</section>
<section id='TSV-1'>
@@ -673,6 +672,10 @@
compelled to disregard certain DNT requests to comply with a
local law, regulation, or order.
</p>
+ <p class="issue" data-number="161" title="Do we need a tracking status value for partial compliance or rejecting DNT?">
+ <b>[PENDING REVIEW]</b> The <code><a>D</a></code> tracking status
+ value indicates rejection.
+ </p>
</section>
<section id='TSV-U'>
@@ -718,6 +721,11 @@
deploy for the designated resource at some point in the future,
but that cannot be relied upon as an indication of conformance.
</p>
+ <p class="issue" data-number="161" title="Do we need a tracking status value for partial compliance or rejecting DNT?">
+ <b>[PENDING REVIEW]</b> The <code><a>!</a></code> tracking status
+ value indicates non-compliance in a format that conforms to the
+ response syntax.
+ </p>
</section>
</section>
Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 21:19:04 UTC