- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:10:07 +0100
- To: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Hi Folks, while we are working on the new issues, I suggest we close the set of TPE-related issues that have been PENDING REVIEW for many months. These document the outcome of our former discussions on TPE where we reached a conclusion that resulted in text. For each of those issues, the text resolving the issue is already included into the TPE spec (and has been there for a long time). Please: Validate that you can live with the resolution of the enclosed issues (Deadline: December 03). In case you want to object to closing an issue, please provide the required documentation (see "the plan"), i.e., roughly you should say why the issue cannot be closed, what concern you have that is not addressed, and what alternative text you proposed to mitigate your concern. Thanks a lot! matthias --------------8<------------------ http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/137 ISSUE-137: Does hybrid tracking status need to distinguish between first party (1) and outsourcing service provider acting as a first party (s) http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/153 ISSUE-153: What are the implications on software that changes requests but does not necessarily initiate them? http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/161 ISSUE-161: Do we need a tracking status value for partial compliance? http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/164 ISSUE-164: To what extent should the "same-party" attribute of tracking status resource be required http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/168 ISSUE-168: What is the correct way for sub-services to signal that they are taking advantage of a transferred exception? http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/195 ISSUE-195: Flows and signals for handling "potential" out of band consent http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/197 ISSUE-197: How do we notify the user why a Disregard signal is received?
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 09:10:34 UTC