- From: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:51:50 -0500
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: "public-touchevents@w3.org" <public-touchevents@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFUtAY_eFkmVg7uEbxGmcGSQV8JrSX1dsS3ZBZS33vcF8eWx-A@mail.gmail.com>
We discussed this topic in our conference call <https://www.w3.org/2015/01/27-touchevents-minutes.html#item05> today. Consensus of the group was that we'd use the following process for landing changes which balances both low-overhead and accountability: - Submit a pull request and post a link to this list asking for feedback - Perhaps we can automate sending the PR notification to the list? - As soon as one of the listed spec editors approves the PR it can be merged - If there's debate over a PR that has already landed, it may be reverted until consensus is reached Rick On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk > > wrote: > >> On 26/01/2015 17:07, Rick Byers wrote: >> >>> Personally I'd vote for a light-weight process (especially for "trivial" >>> editorial changes) where landing a change is blocked only on another CG >>> member reviewing a PR. Of course if there's ever contention on a >>> change, we should block (reverting if necessary) on obtaining group >>> consensus. But I'd rather not slow down folks like Patrick making a >>> bunch of minor edits, and add unnecessary bureaucracy to our conference >>> calls. >>> >> >> I don't have direct write access to the repo (as I didn't shout when Art >> listed the users that should), but I was planning to do it via fork/PR. If >> you think it's easier for me to get the keys to the cadillac, then my >> username is, unsurprisingly, "patrickhlauke" :) > > > D'oh - my bad, you should have been on my list of "CG members whose > accounts I know off the top of my head" (how could I forget about your > touch tests <https://github.com/patrickhlauke/touch>?). Sorry! I don't > think any of us should land changes completely unilaterally (i.e. even with > write access, we will probably want to submit a PR for someone else to look > at), so it's not likely to make too much difference. None the less, I > think any active member should have permission. I'll ask Mike to add you. > > >> >> P >> -- >> Patrick H. Lauke >> >> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke >> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com >> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2015 21:52:37 UTC