- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:26:23 +0000
- To: public-touchevents@w3.org
On 26/01/2015 17:07, Rick Byers wrote: > Personally I'd vote for a light-weight process (especially for "trivial" > editorial changes) where landing a change is blocked only on another CG > member reviewing a PR. Of course if there's ever contention on a > change, we should block (reverting if necessary) on obtaining group > consensus. But I'd rather not slow down folks like Patrick making a > bunch of minor edits, and add unnecessary bureaucracy to our conference > calls. I don't have direct write access to the repo (as I didn't shout when Art listed the users that should), but I was planning to do it via fork/PR. If you think it's easier for me to get the keys to the cadillac, then my username is, unsurprisingly, "patrickhlauke" :) P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 17:26:46 UTC