- From: Rick Byers <rbyers@chromium.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:07:51 -0500
- To: "public-touchevents@w3.org" <public-touchevents@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 17:08:40 UTC
Let's try to agree here on a process for landing changes to the V1 errata <http://rawgit.com/w3c/touch-events/v1-errata/touchevents.html> and touch event extensions note <http://rawgit.com/w3c/touch-events/master/touchevents.html>. I don't know what the other WGs have been doing, so feel free to point me at something official. Personally I'd vote for a light-weight process (especially for "trivial" editorial changes) where landing a change is blocked only on another CG member reviewing a PR. Of course if there's ever contention on a change, we should block (reverting if necessary) on obtaining group consensus. But I'd rather not slow down folks like Patrick making a bunch of minor edits, and add unnecessary bureaucracy to our conference calls. Thoughts? Rick
Received on Monday, 26 January 2015 17:08:40 UTC