Re: Closing out our VTT 'wide review' bugs, very little left. Please help!

I mean “closing” not “closed”…subject corrected...


> On Nov 14, 2016, at 16:10 , David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> Notably remaining:
> 
> 1.  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28265
> 
> Feedback on what Ruby support is needed.  Please tell us what you think.
> 
> 2. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28474 and https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28473
> 
> CSS Selectors; how do we want to resolve these.
> 
> 3.  https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28258
> 
> A request for a formal grammar, which I think we’ll simply defer.  Simon thought maybe railroad diagrams; I am wondering if we can simply link to the intro that was on webplatform and that I have moved to the Wiki?  (I think an informative link to this from the spec. would be helpful.)
> 
> 
> 
> Then, on <https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebVTT_Wide_Review#Implementations> I classified all the bugs and entered up the CG disposition status, except for these 4.  Tell me if you disagree with any (or even edit the wiki).
> 
> I really want to get these resolved; then to the WG for their comment; then to ask Thierry both to give the feedback to the commenters, and to initiate a short second wide review and then request a CR transition.
> 
> Small amounts to do; let’s do it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
> 
> 

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 00:50:25 UTC