- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:47:06 +0000
- To: public-texttracks@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28524
Bug ID: 28524
Summary: (editorial) Conformance for authors vs Document
conformance
Product: TextTracks CG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: WebVTT
Assignee: dave.null@w3.org
Reporter: simonp@opera.com
QA Contact: public-texttracks@w3.org
CC: philipj@opera.com, silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/#h2_conformance
"2.1 Conformance for authors"
"2.2 Document conformance"
Document conformance is usually a synonym for conformance for authors --
authors write documents, so requirements that apply to documents is the same as
those that apply to authors. But the section titled "Document conformance"
isn't about that.
I suggest restructuring a bit, so that the text in 2.2 Document conformance is
directly under Conformance, then rename "Conformance for authors" to
"Conformance classes". That section can then separately discuss conformance for
authors/documents vs conformance for UAs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2015 07:47:09 UTC