- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:47:06 +0000
- To: public-texttracks@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28524 Bug ID: 28524 Summary: (editorial) Conformance for authors vs Document conformance Product: TextTracks CG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/ OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: WebVTT Assignee: dave.null@w3.org Reporter: simonp@opera.com QA Contact: public-texttracks@w3.org CC: philipj@opera.com, silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/#h2_conformance "2.1 Conformance for authors" "2.2 Document conformance" Document conformance is usually a synonym for conformance for authors -- authors write documents, so requirements that apply to documents is the same as those that apply to authors. But the section titled "Document conformance" isn't about that. I suggest restructuring a bit, so that the text in 2.2 Document conformance is directly under Conformance, then rename "Conformance for authors" to "Conformance classes". That section can then separately discuss conformance for authors/documents vs conformance for UAs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2015 07:47:09 UTC